Dear J-
Growing up my favorite books were always the disaster-adventures; from fiction (The Cay, Call it Courage, Robinson Crusoe) to real life (Adrift, Poon Lim, the Shackleton and Scott expeditions) I’d read along — punctuated by the appropriate sip of water when prompted by the narrator’s growing thirst — right alongside them in that leaky raft or deserted isle. I think part of me just wanted to be prepared for survival situations, despite the complete lack of application — we rarely camped, we never sailed, and we certainly never ventured far from the highways. Back when bandages used to come in hinged metal containers I would save them for survival kits, squirreling away random bits of candy, string, tools, and paper (as tinder). Central to all plots was the indomitable will to survive and the ever-resourceful hero.
So I read with some trepidation The House of Sixty Fathers (Meindert DeJong, illustrated by Maurice Sendak), which tells the tale of a young boy’s journey back to his family through war-torn China; trepidation because let’s face it, between Amy Tan and Maxine Hong Kingston we’ve developed the notion that traditional East Asian culture is steeped in the subjugation of women by insecurely masculine males, all of whom just need some foreign culture to step in and rescue them. David Guterson — Snow Falling on Cedars; check. The Joy Luck Club — check. Between the heart-wrenching descriptions of hunger and desperation, and the palpable fear of discovery, though, we learn something about the protagonist, Tien Pao: he’s brave and resourceful, not just waiting around to be rescued. Though the titular House of Sixty Fathers refers to the barracks of American airmen who temporarily adopt him, it’s not solely because he’s a refugee; it’s because he has done them a good turn by rescuing one of their comrades.
I wonder why my expectations of Asian characters are so low; wouldn’t it make more sense to be informed by the rich panoply of faces and people I’ve met rather than the all-too-often flat silhouettes sketched out by modern literature? I now go into most books with a skeptical eye, wary for the moment I can put my finger on some stereotype and sing out in horrified glee. With such an acid test, very few books stand up to critical scrutiny; I’m sure I’d be better off not less critical of the books which deserve it, but less wary of ones I don’t know (yet).
Mike